Medijski watch dog

Ostra ocena International Press Institute, katerega direktor David Dadge poziva vlado, da se opredeli proti dejanju skupine ljudi, ki je ovadila Blaža Zgago, Mateja Šurca in skupino 571 podpisnikov peticije. To bo vlada sicer težko naredila, saj je kar pet od šestih članov po zapisih v Večeru in drugih medijih članov vladajoče stranke SDS.

Spomnimo, da IPI obeta svojo medijsko komisijo, ki jo bo poslala v Slovenijo po tistem, ko te ni ustanovila vlada. Celoten članek in spodaj.

IPI Urges Prosecutors to Drop Defamation Charges in Slovenia

07 February 2008 (PRESS RELEASE)

The International Press Institute (IPI), the global network of editors, media executives and leading journalists in over 120 countries, strongly criticises the defamation charges brought against the individuals who established and signed the “Petition Against Censorship and Political Pressures on Journalists in Slovenia” (the Petition).

According to information before IPI, on 6 February 2008, a group of six Slovenian citizens filed defamation charges with the Slovenian Public Prosecutor’s Office against the initiators and signatories of the Petition. The group claims that the allegations made in the Petition are completely untrue, and that its distribution in international circles defames the Slovenian Republic, has damaged Slovenia’s good reputation, and has inflicted political and material damage on the Slovenian state.

The Petition was initiated in September 2007 by journalists Blaz Zgaga and Matej Surc and signed by 571 journalists. It highlighted their concerns over political pressures exerted on the media in Slovenia.

“Although IPI makes no comment on the content of the original Petition, we strongly urge that all charges are dropped immediately, and I would encourage the government to speak out against groups who seek to protect the state’s reputation in a democracy where free and open debate should not only be allowed but welcomed,” said David Dadge, IPI Director. “I would also invite the government to consider removing the law under which the charges have been made, so that it cannot be applied again. Laws that protect the state’s reputation serve no purpose in a modern society.”